David Hargreaves

Does It Really Matter Who Has The Skills?

October 14, 2009 by David Hargreaves · 4 comments

Recently there has been a fair amount of discussion about the pros and cons of PR agencies setting up an “agency within an agency” to focus on social media or whether social media should just become part of what the regular PR account teams do? The most recent discussion was this post on Todd Defren’s blog

Given I am in the process of moving into a new role to set up a new Next Fifteen digital agency but also continuing to spend some of my time leading Bite’s digital services development, this is a question that I have spent a good deal of time thinking about recently.

In short, while there is no right and wrong answer, my view is that you need to do both. All PR staff need to embrace social media as part of broadening their skills in building and managing relationships and engaging with influencers. At the same time there are certain skills which are important to the development and execution of really strong campaigns which traditional PR people just do not have.

In the future, I would expect PR practitioners to continue to provide top level counsel, understand their clients business and markets intimately, to use all their skills to craft stories and to then sell those stories into all the key influencers in a given space. Social media channels have become a hugely important part of the outreach and as such, firmly sit in the domain of the PR professional. In some ways, I think about this aspect of social media as ’social media relations.’ (In many ways we can probably start dropping the word social because there are very few media outlets that do not have a social element. Maybe we should just be talking about the media, albeit a media that has undergone a huge transformation – I digress). 

However, social media, or rather the internet itself, has opened up a whole new way of communicating directly with the consumer rather than through the classic third party influencer. This is the area where I believe traditional PR practitioners could benefit from getting access to some specialist skills, as brands take on the role of communicating directly with the customer.  Specifically I think the areas which require an agency to invest in new skills are as follows:

  • The expertise and technology to provide data, analysis and insight to focus campaigns on the most influential nodes of any single client issue or discussion. This requires analytical skills more closely associated with the advertising, direct marketing and search world’s than it does PR.
  • Individuals who can develop digital strategies based on the insights gleaned from the above, but also using an understanding of how to use digital channels to maximize engagement with the customer through every touch point within the organization.
  • The skills to create rich digital assets. The ability to develop a data visualization or a highly interactive and immersive experience on YouTube is a very different skill all together. PR people bought up in a text-based world do not have the skills to build these assets.

Again referring to one of Todd’s posts (I have always had a huge amount of respect for Todd and Shift since they created the SMR template – genius piece of marketing)  it is very hard for any single PR agency to bring all of these skills in house because not all clients will need them all of the time. That being said, I think that is where as a group, Next Fifteen has an advantage in as much as it has six fantastic PR brands representing some of the best blue chip brands in the world so there is an immediate logic in sharing highly specialist expertise.

Any PR agency that doesn’t bring all these skills in house can still deliver fantastic campaigns if it works closely with the clients’ other marketing agencies. It is the integration of the skills not whose office they sit in which is the important bit. However, there is one thing that success is dependent on though, and that is a clients’ willingness to try to integrate the functions more closely. Ultimately, regardless of what an agency may provide, it is irrelevant if the buyer still wants to buy in silos with the PR person buying social media relations and the marketing person buying a shiny new web property.

{ 4 comments }

1 erich nolan bertussi davies October 15, 2009 at 6:29 am

calling this aspect of the internet ’social media’ is a mis-nomer.

the internet IS social media.

it’s just taken the greedy guts this long to let the geeks do what they do and code us some base code that we can do what we are doing, which is only what we promised we would be doing over 15 years ago.

so what you put your own content on the internet with a browser..
you were meant to..
don’t sub divide a new department..
just wake up and smell the internet. :)
“this is the internet”

ENBd/

2 Joseph Kingsbury, Text 100 October 15, 2009 at 11:12 am

David – I think your last point on silos is critical. Those silos won’t go away until all disciplines (I’ll throw advertising in the mix) better understand the extent to which digital and social media overlap in terms of driving success for each respective area, and how much more effective they can collectively be instead of trying to ‘own’ it. If PR, marketing and advertising were once largely defined by the mediums they used reach people (press releases, ads, direct marketing, etc), that’s more and more an esoteric distinction, particularly in the eyes of people consuming all that stuff. It’s all becoming media (or whatever term you like) and it’s all increasingly digital and social.

PR, marketing and ad people will eventually stop tripping over each other. The more forward-thinking companies are already starting to merge the functions into one and I suspect that trend will continue. It should even intensify as lines of business start to bypass comms/marketing altogether and start exploiting digital/social without asking how to do it.

Joseph Kingsbury, Text 100

3 David Hargreaves October 15, 2009 at 1:30 pm

I think you make a great point Joseph about the merging of functions and business functions just embracing ‘digital’ as the way they run their customer service department or whatever.

We have already seen a couple of examples of a company setting up a social media team to turbo charge the thinking and then disband it sending people back into their functions. At the same time I know of two clients currently hiring for a social media head.

It’s still a fairly mixed bag in the way companies are tackling it, but I think the end destination is clear.

4 business credit October 21, 2009 at 1:16 pm

It’s all becoming media (or whatever term you like) and it’s all increasingly digital and social.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:
Mastering the dark art of video

Next post:
Mo’ Money