<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech PR budgets in the UK – some interesting stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitecommunications.com/2009/12/10/tech-pr-budgets-in-the-uk-%e2%80%93-some-interesting-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitecommunications.com/2009/12/10/tech-pr-budgets-in-the-uk-%e2%80%93-some-interesting-stats/</link>
	<description>A global communications consultancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grantie</title>
		<link>http://www.bitecommunications.com/2009/12/10/tech-pr-budgets-in-the-uk-%e2%80%93-some-interesting-stats/comment-page-/#comment-9516</link>
		<dc:creator>Grantie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitecommunications.com/?p=2749#comment-9516</guid>
		<description>Haha, that would indeed be a quality Stat, Steve. Unfortunately it&#039;s not :). The two are separate figures - so marketing is spending 25% of digital &#039;stuff&#039; and 17.6% on PR. As per reply to Pinny, unfortunately we simply didn&#039;t have the space in this initial survey to really drill down on either of those statistics. 

I admit its all very top line in its findings, but hopefully the Group and others can use these numbers as a base for further, more in-depth research into those component parts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, that would indeed be a quality Stat, Steve. Unfortunately it&#8217;s not <img src='http://www.bitecommunications.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . The two are separate figures &#8211; so marketing is spending 25% of digital &#8216;stuff&#8217; and 17.6% on PR. As per reply to Pinny, unfortunately we simply didn&#8217;t have the space in this initial survey to really drill down on either of those statistics. </p>
<p>I admit its all very top line in its findings, but hopefully the Group and others can use these numbers as a base for further, more in-depth research into those component parts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

